Ad is loading...
IWF vs TCHP
IWF vs TCHP Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs TCHP
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$346.15
Change-$20.71 (-5.65%)
Volume$7.84K
Net Assets97.97B
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Price$36.58
Change-$2.18 (-5.62%)
Volume$4K
Net Assets1.02B
IWF vs TCHP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. TCHP commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and TCHP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 98B vs. TCHP (1.02B). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than TCHP: IWF (-8.548) vs TCHP (-12.990). IWF was incepted earlier than TCHP: IWF (25 years) vs TCHP (5 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than TCHP (0.57). TCHP has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | TCHP | IWF / TCHP | |
| Gain YTD | -8.548 | -12.990 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 98B | 1.02B | 9,580% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.57 | 33% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 18.40 | 65% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +2.38% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||
TCHP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCHP has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TCHP jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCHP | 100% | -5.47% | ||
| SNPS - TCHP | 76% Closely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| AMZN - TCHP | 75% Closely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| MSFT - TCHP | 75% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| LRCX - TCHP | 69% Closely correlated | -11.60% | ||
| ASML - TCHP | 68% Closely correlated | -6.84% | ||
More | ||||