| IWF | TCHP | IWF / TCHP | |
| Gain YTD | 3.892 | 0.903 | 431% |
| Net Assets | 125B | 2.16B | 5,798% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.57 | 32% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 15.80 | 101% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| IWF | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SUSL | 137.56 | 0.95 | +0.69% |
| iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF | |||
| CEV | 10.69 | 0.04 | +0.38% |
| Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust | |||
| IVOL | 17.48 | -0.04 | -0.23% |
| Quadratic Intrst Rt Vol & Infl H ETF | |||
| BHDG | 22.70 | -0.22 | -0.96% |
| Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF | |||
| RFIX | 35.32 | -0.94 | -2.59% |
| Simplify Downside Interest Rate Hedge Strategy ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCHP has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TCHP jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCHP | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| TSM - TCHP | 68% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| AVGO - TCHP | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| GS - TCHP | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.73% | ||
| CVNA - TCHP | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| META - TCHP | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
More | ||||