IWFL
Price
$61.44
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Net Assets
35.18M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NVDL
Price
$36.18
Change
-$1.51 (-4.01%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Net Assets
4.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWFL vs NVDL

IWFL vs NVDL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) vs. GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL)

Key Takeaways

  • ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) delivers 2x daily exposure to the broad Russell 1000 Growth Index, providing diversified leveraged access to large-cap U.S. growth equities across multiple sectors.
  • GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) offers 2x daily exposure to a single stock, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), resulting in concentrated thematic exposure tied exclusively to one semiconductor leader.
  • IWFL uses an exchange-traded note (ETN) structure from UBS with a 0.95% expense ratio, while NVDL employs swap agreements in an actively managed ETF structure from GraniteShares with an approximate 1.05% expense ratio.
  • IWFL features broad sector diversification within growth equities, whereas NVDL maintains zero diversification beyond NVIDIA (NVDA) and its supply chain influences.
  • Both products carry significant leverage-related risks, including compounding effects and potential for substantial volatility, but IWFL spreads risk across hundreds of holdings while NVDL concentrates it in one name.
  • Expense ratios and structural differences position IWFL as a leveraged broad-growth vehicle and NVDL as a high-conviction single-stock tactical tool within the same overarching technology and growth theme.

Introduction

Investors seeking leveraged exposure to U.S. growth and technology themes often evaluate products that amplify market movements. ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) do not compete directly; instead, they represent distinct strategies within the leveraged equities category. IWFL provides broad-based 2x exposure to growth stocks, while NVDL targets concentrated daily 2x performance of NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). This comparison helps investors understand structural trade-offs between diversified index leverage and single-stock leverage when pursuing similar thematic objectives in the current market environment.

ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) Overview

ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) seeks to deliver two times the compounded quarterly performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The underlying index comprises approximately 1,000 large-cap U.S. growth companies selected from the Russell 3000 Index based on higher price-to-book ratios and growth characteristics. As an exchange-traded note (ETN), the product relies on the creditworthiness of issuer UBS rather than holding a portfolio of securities. It maintains a 0.95% expense ratio and employs a passive leveraged strategy with quarterly rebalancing tied to the index methodology. The structure offers exposure across technology, consumer discretionary, communication services, and healthcare sectors typical of growth benchmarks, distinguishing it through broad diversification rather than concentration.

GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) Overview

GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the daily percentage change in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) common stock. The actively managed fund primarily achieves this exposure through swap agreements on the underlying stock, supplemented by options and direct holdings. It carries an expense ratio of approximately 1.05% and resets leverage daily, requiring monitoring for periods longer than one day due to compounding effects. As a non-diversified single-stock leveraged product, NVDL maintains effectively one core holding with minimal additional positions for operational purposes. This structure provides pure, concentrated exposure to the semiconductor and artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem centered on NVIDIA (NVDA).

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both products operate within the broader U.S. technology and growth equity landscape, driven by artificial intelligence (AI) adoption, semiconductor demand, and capital expenditure cycles among hyperscale data center operators. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations, inflation trends, and corporate earnings growth influence capital flows into growth segments. Regulatory developments around AI governance and export controls on advanced chips represent ongoing sector risks. Recent market cycles have highlighted rotation between broad growth indexes and individual leaders, with technology remaining a dominant theme amid productivity gains from AI infrastructure investments. These dynamics affect leveraged products through amplified sensitivity to earnings reports, supply chain developments, and macroeconomic shifts.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, performance differentials have reflected the contrasting exposure profiles. IWFL’s broad Russell 1000 Growth linkage has tracked diversified movements across multiple growth companies, moderating volatility through sector spread. NVDL’s single-stock focus has produced more pronounced swings aligned with NVIDIA (NVDA) earnings cycles, product launches, and competitive developments in the semiconductor space. During periods of sector rotation favoring broad market leadership, IWFL has offered more balanced participation; in concentrated rallies driven by one dominant name, NVDL has delivered higher beta to that specific catalyst. Interest rate sensitivity and macro shifts have influenced both, though NVDL’s daily reset amplifies short-term deviations from longer-term trends compared with IWFL’s quarterly compounding approach.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing leveraged products like ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) can leverage this platform to refine their analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic edge to ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) in the current environment due to its broader diversification across growth holdings, lower expense ratio, and reduced single-name concentration risk relative to GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). NVDL offers compelling tactical exposure when NVIDIA (NVDA) momentum is strong, yet the structural simplicity and multi-sector spread of IWFL provide more consistent positioning across varied market regimes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IWFL vs. NVDL commentary
Sep 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWFL is a Hold and NVDL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NVDL has more net assets: 4.09B vs. IWFL (35.2M). NVDL has a higher annual dividend yield than IWFL: NVDL (23.327) vs IWFL (3.864). IWFL was incepted earlier than NVDL: IWFL (6 years) vs NVDL (4 years).
IWFLNVDLIWFL / NVDL
Gain YTD3.86423.32717%
Net Assets35.2M4.09B1%
Total Expense RatioN/A1.05-
TurnoverN/A10597.00-
Yield0.000.00-
Fund Existence6 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWFLNVDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
IWFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NVDL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLON32.741.02
+3.22%
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
TETH12.380.13
+1.06%
21shares Ethereum Staking ETF
UDN18.340.06
+0.33%
Invesco DB US Dollar Bearish
IVOG141.400.32
+0.23%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
USSE40.620.09
+0.22%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF