Investors seeking large-cap U.S. growth exposure often evaluate IWY and SCHG as complementary or alternative vehicles within the same category. These two exchange-traded funds compete directly by delivering passive strategies focused on growth-oriented equities, yet they differ in index construction, portfolio concentration, and cost efficiency. In the current environment of sustained interest in technology-driven growth and large-cap leadership, comparing their structural profiles helps clarify relative positioning for long-term portfolio construction.
The iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) seeks to track the Russell Top 200 Growth Index, which measures the performance of the largest capitalization growth segment of the U.S. equity market. The fund holds approximately 110 securities and employs a passive, market-capitalization-weighted approach with quarterly rebalancing aligned to the index methodology. Top holdings typically include heavy allocations to names such as NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corporation, resulting in elevated concentration in the technology sector. The expense ratio stands at 0.20%. As a non-diversified fund by design, IWY emphasizes the largest growth companies, which can amplify exposure to mega-cap leaders while limiting breadth compared to broader indices.
The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) aims to track the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, capturing large-cap U.S. equities exhibiting growth characteristics. The fund maintains approximately 197 holdings and follows a passive, market-capitalization-weighted strategy with periodic rebalancing to match the index. Top positions generally feature NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and Amazon.com Inc., with a more balanced distribution across growth names. The expense ratio is 0.04%. SCHG offers broader diversification within the large-cap growth universe while maintaining a focus on companies with favorable growth metrics.
The large-cap growth segment remains influenced by ongoing advancements in artificial intelligence, semiconductor demand, and digital transformation across technology and communication services sectors. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and corporate earnings cycles continue to shape capital allocation toward companies demonstrating scalable growth. Regulatory developments around technology platforms and data privacy add layers of consideration, while sector risks include valuation compression in high-growth names and potential shifts in investor preference toward value or defensive areas during periods of economic uncertainty. Both ETFs benefit from the structural tailwinds in innovation-driven industries but carry sensitivity to rotations away from concentrated growth leadership.
In recent market cycles, both ETFs have demonstrated resilience tied to the performance of their largest holdings in technology and growth-oriented sectors. IWY’s greater concentration has historically produced higher sensitivity to swings in mega-cap technology names, contributing to distinct volatility patterns relative to the broader market. SCHG’s wider holdings base has supported more stable relative positioning during sector rotations and earnings seasons. Over broader timeframes, differences in expense ratios and diversification have influenced net returns and risk-adjusted outcomes, with SCHG often benefiting from cost efficiency amid varying market conditions.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely favor SCHG at present due to its lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings for improved diversification, and competitive exposure to large-cap growth themes with reduced concentration risk relative to IWY. The combination of cost efficiency and broader sector representation positions SCHG favorably for investors prioritizing long-term efficiency within the large-cap growth category, though individual suitability depends on specific risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| IWY | SCHG | IWY / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 4.596 | 10.181 | 45% |
| Net Assets | 15.8B | 62.3B | 25% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.04 | 500% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 27.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.39 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| IWY | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 85% | 25 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFE | 78.03 | 0.12 | +0.15% |
| WisdomTree Europe SmallCap Dividend ETF | |||
| ILTB | 47.63 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
| iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | |||
| JHMM | 75.88 | -0.13 | -0.17% |
| JHancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | |||
| NFLP | 19.44 | -0.49 | -2.48% |
| Kurv Yield Premium Str Netflix ETF | |||
| DRN | 10.74 | -0.33 | -2.98% |
| Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWY has been loosely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWY jumps, then GS could also see price increases.