IWY
Price
$287.10
Change
-$2.29 (-0.79%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
15.77B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCHG
Price
$35.76
Change
-$0.10 (-0.28%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
62.33B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWY vs SCHG

IWY vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) vs. Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG)

Key Takeaways

  • Both IWY and SCHG are passive large-cap growth ETFs targeting U.S. equities with strong growth characteristics, but they track different indices leading to variations in concentration and breadth.
  • IWY offers a more concentrated portfolio of approximately 110 holdings from the Russell Top 200 Growth Index, with heavier weighting toward mega-cap technology names compared to the broader SCHG.
  • SCHG provides greater diversification with roughly 197 holdings from the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index and features a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.04% versus 0.20% for IWY.
  • Sector exposure in both funds centers on technology and communication services, though IWY exhibits higher concentration risk in electronic technology while SCHG spreads exposure across additional sectors such as healthcare and financial services.
  • Liquidity profiles are strong for both, with SCHG benefiting from larger assets under management and higher average daily trading volume, supporting tighter bid-ask spreads in many market conditions.
  • Structural differences position SCHG as a lower-cost, more diversified option for broad large-cap growth exposure, while IWY suits investors seeking concentrated exposure to the largest growth companies.

Introduction

Investors seeking large-cap U.S. growth exposure often evaluate IWY and SCHG as complementary or alternative vehicles within the same category. These two exchange-traded funds compete directly by delivering passive strategies focused on growth-oriented equities, yet they differ in index construction, portfolio concentration, and cost efficiency. In the current environment of sustained interest in technology-driven growth and large-cap leadership, comparing their structural profiles helps clarify relative positioning for long-term portfolio construction.

iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) Overview

The iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) seeks to track the Russell Top 200 Growth Index, which measures the performance of the largest capitalization growth segment of the U.S. equity market. The fund holds approximately 110 securities and employs a passive, market-capitalization-weighted approach with quarterly rebalancing aligned to the index methodology. Top holdings typically include heavy allocations to names such as NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corporation, resulting in elevated concentration in the technology sector. The expense ratio stands at 0.20%. As a non-diversified fund by design, IWY emphasizes the largest growth companies, which can amplify exposure to mega-cap leaders while limiting breadth compared to broader indices.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Overview

The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) aims to track the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, capturing large-cap U.S. equities exhibiting growth characteristics. The fund maintains approximately 197 holdings and follows a passive, market-capitalization-weighted strategy with periodic rebalancing to match the index. Top positions generally feature NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and Amazon.com Inc., with a more balanced distribution across growth names. The expense ratio is 0.04%. SCHG offers broader diversification within the large-cap growth universe while maintaining a focus on companies with favorable growth metrics.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The large-cap growth segment remains influenced by ongoing advancements in artificial intelligence, semiconductor demand, and digital transformation across technology and communication services sectors. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and corporate earnings cycles continue to shape capital allocation toward companies demonstrating scalable growth. Regulatory developments around technology platforms and data privacy add layers of consideration, while sector risks include valuation compression in high-growth names and potential shifts in investor preference toward value or defensive areas during periods of economic uncertainty. Both ETFs benefit from the structural tailwinds in innovation-driven industries but carry sensitivity to rotations away from concentrated growth leadership.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have demonstrated resilience tied to the performance of their largest holdings in technology and growth-oriented sectors. IWY’s greater concentration has historically produced higher sensitivity to swings in mega-cap technology names, contributing to distinct volatility patterns relative to the broader market. SCHG’s wider holdings base has supported more stable relative positioning during sector rotations and earnings seasons. Over broader timeframes, differences in expense ratios and diversification have influenced net returns and risk-adjusted outcomes, with SCHG often benefiting from cost efficiency amid varying market conditions.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely favor SCHG at present due to its lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings for improved diversification, and competitive exposure to large-cap growth themes with reduced concentration risk relative to IWY. The combination of cost efficiency and broader sector representation positions SCHG favorably for investors prioritizing long-term efficiency within the large-cap growth category, though individual suitability depends on specific risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IWY vs. SCHG commentary
Aug 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWY is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 62.3B vs. IWY (15.8B). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWY: SCHG (10.181) vs IWY (4.596). IWY was incepted earlier than SCHG: IWY (17 years) vs SCHG (17 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWY (0.20). SCHG has a higher turnover IWY (18.00) vs IWY (18.00).
IWYSCHGIWY / SCHG
Gain YTD4.59610.18145%
Net Assets15.8B62.3B25%
Total Expense Ratio0.200.04500%
Turnover18.0027.0067%
Yield0.360.3994%
Fund Existence17 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWYSCHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IWY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFE78.030.12
+0.15%
WisdomTree Europe SmallCap Dividend ETF
ILTB47.63-0.06
-0.13%
iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF
JHMM75.88-0.13
-0.17%
JHancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
NFLP19.44-0.49
-2.48%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Netflix ETF
DRN10.74-0.33
-2.98%
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF

IWY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWY has been loosely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWY jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWY
1D Price
Change %
IWY100%
+1.76%
GS - IWY
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
ROP - IWY
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
NXPI - IWY
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
MS - IWY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
APH - IWY
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
More