IXUS
Price
$94.25
Change
+$1.36 (+1.46%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Net Assets
56.68B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCHF
Price
$26.88
Change
+$0.37 (+1.40%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Net Assets
63.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IXUS vs SCHF

Header iconIXUS vs SCHF Comparison
Open Charts IXUS vs SCHFBanner chart's image
IXUS vs SCHF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) vs. Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF)

Key Takeaways

  • IXUS provides broader exposure including emerging markets and small-caps with 4,172 holdings, while SCHF focuses on large- and mid-cap developed markets ex-US with 1,500 holdings.
  • SCHF offers a lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to IXUS's 0.07%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term holding.
  • Both ETFs exhibit similar sector profiles led by financials (~22-23%), industrials, and technology, but IXUS includes greater emerging market influence.
  • SCHF demonstrates slightly lower volatility due to exclusion of emerging markets, appealing to risk-averse investors seeking developed market stability.
  • In recent market cycles, developed markets have shown relative strength amid U.S. dollar fluctuations, benefiting SCHF's positioning.
  • IXUS suits investors pursuing comprehensive international diversification, while SCHF prioritizes low-cost access to established economies.

Introduction

IXUS and SCHF represent core options for international equity exposure outside the U.S., appealing to investors diversifying amid U.S. market concentration risks. While both target non-U.S. equities, they diverge structurally: IXUS encompasses developed and emerging markets across large-, mid-, and small-caps for total international coverage, whereas SCHF concentrates on large- and mid-cap developed markets. This comparison is timely as capital flows shift toward international assets amid evolving interest rate environments, currency dynamics, and sector rotation away from U.S. tech dominance. Investors weighing ETF comparison for sector exposure and relative positioning will find these funds provide alternative paths to global growth with low costs and high liquidity.

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) Overview

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) is a passive fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index, capturing large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from developed and emerging markets excluding the U.S. It holds 4,172 stocks, offering extensive diversification. Top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (3.58%), Samsung Electronics (1.53%), and ASML Holding (1.32%). Sector allocations emphasize financials (22.33%), information technology (15.68%), and industrials (15.62%), with exposure to consumer discretionary, materials, and health care. The expense ratio is 0.07%, and the fund structure supports high liquidity on NASDAQ. Distinguishing features include broad geographic reach across 20+ countries and semi-annual rebalancing, ideal for comprehensive non-U.S. equity exposure without emerging market exclusion.

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) Overview

The Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) is a passive ETF tracking the FTSE Developed ex US Index, focusing on large- and mid-cap companies in developed markets outside the U.S. It comprises 1,500 holdings for targeted exposure. Top holdings feature Samsung Electronics (2.40%), ASML Holding (1.95%), and SK hynix (1.36%). Sector breakdown highlights financial services (23.34%), industrials (19.00%), and technology (13.05%), followed by health care and consumer cyclical. With an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03%, SCHF emphasizes cost efficiency and trades on NYSE Arca. Key attributes include low portfolio turnover (around 5%) and emphasis on stable developed economies like Japan, U.K., and Canada, positioning it as a streamlined choice for ex-U.S. developed market access.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The international equity landscape benefits from macroeconomic tailwinds including potential U.S. dollar weakening, which amplifies returns for unhedged ex-U.S. funds. Developed markets, core to SCHF, gain from resilient earnings in financials and industrials amid stabilizing interest rates, while IXUS's emerging market tilt captures growth in technology semiconductors and consumer sectors. Capital inflows have accelerated into international ETFs during recent cycles, driven by U.S. valuation premiums and geopolitical diversification needs. Risks include currency volatility, trade tensions, and regional slowdowns, but regulatory support for global trade and commodity trends bolster sector exposure. Both ETFs align with thematic shifts toward non-U.S. value and cyclical rotations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, SCHF has exhibited slightly stronger relative positioning versus IXUS, reflecting developed markets' outperformance amid reduced emerging market volatility. Broader cycles show both funds capturing international rebounds, with SCHF's focus on stable large-caps providing lower drawdowns during risk-off periods. IXUS's inclusion of small-caps and emerging names introduces higher beta to global growth themes like semiconductors, linking to Taiwan and South Korea momentum, while SCHF benefits from European industrials and Canadian financials amid interest rate expectations. Volatility profiles differ modestly, with SCHF's developed purity offering smoother navigation through geopolitical shifts and commodity trends.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like trend-following, mean reversion, and momentum, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, most consistent performers rise to this curated section, adapting dynamically to volatility, sector rotation, and macro shifts. Investors can explore bots tailored to ETFs, stocks, or forex, often displaying recent returns ranging from 20-50% over quarterly periods depending on market regimes. This resource empowers data-driven decisions; visit to identify bots aligning with your international ETF strategies today.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SCHF due to its superior cost efficiency (0.03% expense ratio), focused developed market exposure, and consistent trend alignment in recent cycles. While IXUS offers unmatched diversification, SCHF's lower volatility and structural simplicity enhance risk-adjusted positioning amid macroeconomic uncertainty. Probabilistic edge leans 60-40 toward SCHF for medium-term outperformance based on sector momentum and liquidity profiles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IXUS vs. SCHF commentary
Apr 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IXUS is a Hold and SCHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHF has more net assets: 63.4B vs. IXUS (56.7B). SCHF (11.814) and IXUS (11.354) have matching annual dividend yield . IXUS was incepted earlier than SCHF: IXUS (14 years) vs SCHF (16 years). SCHF (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than IXUS (0.07). SCHF has a higher turnover IXUS (3.00) vs IXUS (3.00).
IXUSSCHFIXUS / SCHF
Gain YTD11.35411.81496%
Net Assets56.7B63.4B89%
Total Expense Ratio0.070.03233%
Turnover3.004.0075%
Yield3.183.4094%
Fund Existence14 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IXUSSCHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IXUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NLR145.960.51
+0.35%
VanEck Uranium & Nuclear ETF
HWAY35.77N/A
N/A
Themes US Infrastructure ETF
KPRO27.56N/A
N/A
KraneShares 100% KWEB Dfnd OutcmJan27ETF
CMBS48.87-0.05
-0.10%
iShares CMBS ETF
YANG25.42-0.74
-2.83%
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF

IXUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXUS has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IXUS jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IXUS
1D Price
Change %
IXUS100%
+1.46%
ASML - IXUS
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.47%
MC - IXUS
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
AZN - IXUS
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%

SCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHF
1D Price
Change %
SCHF100%
+1.40%
STM - SCHF
79%
Closely correlated
+6.37%
SAN - SCHF
70%
Closely correlated
+4.72%
MT - SCHF
68%
Closely correlated
+3.81%
BNT - SCHF
67%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
BMO - SCHF
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
More