IXUS
Price
$96.97
Change
+$1.24 (+1.30%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
58.55B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VEA
Price
$72.31
Change
+$0.31 (+0.43%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
317.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IXUS vs VEA

IXUS vs VEA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) vs. Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA)

Key Takeaways

  • IXUS provides broader exposure including emerging markets (approximately 25%), while VEA focuses exclusively on developed markets ex-US, offering higher concentration in stable economies like Japan and Europe.
  • VEA boasts a lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to IXUS's 0.07%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term holders.
  • Both ETFs maintain high diversification with over 3,800 holdings each; IXUS has around 4,170 holdings versus VEA's 3,893.
  • IXUS exhibits slightly higher volatility due to emerging market inclusion but captures growth from regions like China and India; VEA prioritizes lower-risk developed market stability.
  • Top holdings overlap significantly (e.g., ASML Holding NV, Samsung Electronics), but IXUS weights Taiwan Semiconductor more heavily at 3.62%.
  • Financials dominate both (IXUS 22.18%, VEA 24.2%), reflecting value-oriented sector tilts in international equities.

Introduction

In an era of U.S. equity dominance and shifting global capital flows, comparing IXUS and VEA highlights strategic choices for international diversification. IXUS offers comprehensive ex-US exposure across developed and emerging markets, ideal for investors seeking broad global growth. VEA targets developed markets ex-US, emphasizing stability in mature economies amid geopolitical tensions and interest rate normalization. These passive index ETFs compete as core holdings for portfolios aiming to mitigate U.S.-centric risks, with relevance amplified by recent dollar weakness and international outperformance in recent market cycles. This ETF comparison examines their structural differences, sector exposure, and relative positioning.

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) Overview

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) is a passive ETF tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index, capturing large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from developed and emerging markets excluding the U.S. It holds approximately 4,171 stocks, providing extensive diversification.

Top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (3.62%), Samsung Electronics Ltd (1.50%), ASML Holding NV (1.31%), Tencent Holdings Ltd (1.11%), and SK Hynix Inc (0.85%). Sector allocations feature Financials at 22.18%, Industrials 15.76%, Information Technology 15.63%, Consumer Discretionary 9.01%, and Materials 8.19%. Geographic exposure spans Japan (14.67%), UK (8.94%), Canada (8.32%), China (7.67%), and Taiwan (6.20%).

With an expense ratio of 0.07%, IXUS employs a full replication strategy, rebalanced periodically to match the index. Its structure supports high liquidity (30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.01%) and semi-annual distributions, positioning it as a cost-effective vehicle for total international equity exposure.

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) Overview

The Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) passively tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, focusing on large-, mid-, and small-cap companies in developed markets outside the U.S., including Canada, Europe, and the Pacific. It comprises 3,893 holdings for robust diversification.

Leading holdings are ASML Holding NV (1.85%), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (1.70%), SK hynix Inc. (1.11%), Roche Holding AG (1.04%), and HSBC Holdings plc (0.99%). Sectors emphasize Financials (24.2%), Industrials (18.2%), Consumer Discretionary (11.0%), Technology (9.4%), and Health Care (9.1%). Key regions include Europe (51.20%), Pacific (36.30%), and North America (10.70%).

Featuring a ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03%, VEA uses a full-replication approach with low turnover (2.9%). It offers excellent liquidity (bid-ask spread 0.01%) and quarterly dividends, distinguishing it as a low-cost option for targeted developed market sector exposure and fund performance stability.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The international equity landscape faces macroeconomic tailwinds like dollar weakening, which boosts returns for U.S. investors, alongside accelerating global growth forecasts for 2026. Developed markets benefit from sector rotation into value-oriented financials and industrials, supported by normalizing rates and AI supply chain demand in Europe and Japan. Emerging markets within total ex-US strategies add growth via semiconductors and tech from Taiwan and South Korea, though tempered by geopolitical risks in China and trade tensions.

Capital flows favor diversified international exposure amid U.S. concentration risks, with regulatory shifts and commodity trends influencing allocations. Both ETFs navigate these dynamics, but VEA's developed focus mitigates volatility from emerging market policy uncertainties, while broader strategies capture upside from global earnings cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, international equities have outperformed U.S. benchmarks, with developed ex-US strategies like VEA delivering strong gains driven by European rebounds and Pacific stability. Total ex-US funds including emerging markets, such as IXUS, have shown resilience through diversified growth, though with marginally higher volatility from EM exposure.

Over recent years, both have annualized around 8-9%, but VEA's lower beta reflects smoother rides in risk-off environments. IXUS benefits from EM momentum in AI and exports, while VEA aligns with value rotations and interest rate expectations. Relative positioning favors VEA for stability, IXUS for comprehensive trend capture amid geopolitical shifts and commodity uptrends.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-driven trading bots under current market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like momentum, mean reversion, and pattern recognition, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, helping traders identify signals for stocks, ETFs, and more. Visitors can explore bot details, backtests, and live results to enhance decision-making. Check the Trending AI Robots page today for an edge in volatile markets.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors VEA due to its superior cost efficiency (0.03% expense ratio), concentrated developed market diversification, and lower volatility profile amid ongoing global uncertainties. While IXUS offers valuable emerging market upside, VEA's structural advantages in sector momentum and relative stability position it probabilistically stronger for consistent trend participation over recent cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IXUS vs. VEA commentary
Jun 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IXUS is a Hold and VEA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEA has more net assets: 317B vs. IXUS (58.5B). VEA has a higher annual dividend yield than IXUS: VEA (15.321) vs IXUS (14.569). IXUS was incepted earlier than VEA: IXUS (14 years) vs VEA (19 years). VEA (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than IXUS (0.07). VEA has a higher turnover IXUS (3.00) vs IXUS (3.00).
IXUSVEAIXUS / VEA
Gain YTD14.56915.32195%
Net Assets58.5B317B18%
Total Expense Ratio0.070.03233%
Turnover3.004.0075%
Yield2.832.61108%
Fund Existence14 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IXUSVEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IXUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBHG22.01-0.03
-0.14%
iShares® iBonds® 2027 Term HY & Inc ETF
MTYY21.61-0.14
-0.66%
GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF
ITDD38.20-0.35
-0.92%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF
XOEX39.87-0.38
-0.95%
Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF
KWEB25.38-0.50
-1.93%
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

IXUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXUS has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IXUS jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IXUS
1D Price
Change %
IXUS100%
-0.46%
ASML - IXUS
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
MC - IXUS
45%
Loosely correlated
-4.44%
AZN - IXUS
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%

VEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VEA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VEA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VEA
1D Price
Change %
VEA100%
-0.44%
ASML - VEA
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
SAP - VEA
55%
Loosely correlated
-4.00%
SHEL - VEA
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.27%
MC - VEA
47%
Loosely correlated
-4.44%
AZN - VEA
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%