Ad is loading...
IYW vs QTUM
IYW vs QTUM Comparison
Open Charts IYW vs QTUM
iShares US Technology ETF
Price$159.52
Change-$5.65 (-3.42%)
Volume$7.65K
CapitalizationN/A
Defiance Quantum ETF
Price$83.88
Change-$2.60 (-3.01%)
Volume$2.02K
CapitalizationN/A
IYW vs QTUM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IYW vs. QTUM commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYW is a Hold and QTUM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 20.2B vs. QTUM (549M). QTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than IYW: QTUM (60.288) vs IYW (34.861). IYW was incepted earlier than QTUM: IYW (25 years) vs QTUM (6 years). QTUM has a higher turnover IYW (10.00) vs IYW (10.00).
| IYW | QTUM | IYW / QTUM | |
| Gain YTD | 34.861 | 60.288 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 20.2B | 549M | 3,679% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 10.00 | 31.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.75 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IYW | QTUM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | about 1 month ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IYW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYW | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| CDNS - IYW | 81% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| KLAC - IYW | 80% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| SNPS - IYW | 79% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| AMAT - IYW | 78% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| LRCX - IYW | 77% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||
QTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with MKSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then MKSI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTUM | 100% | +4.71% | ||
| MKSI - QTUM | 82% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| KLAC - QTUM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LRCX - QTUM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| TER - QTUM | 79% Closely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| AMAT - QTUM | 79% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||