Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IYW vs QTUM
IYW vs QTUM Comparison
Open Charts IYW vs QTUM
iShares US Technology ETF
Price$165.14
Change+$0.25 (+0.15%)
Volume$549.6K
Net Assets20.42B
Defiance Quantum ETF
Price$88.65
Change+$0.32 (+0.36%)
Volume$263.54K
Net Assets1.48B
IYW vs QTUM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IYW vs. QTUM commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYW is a Buy and QTUM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 20.4B vs. QTUM (1.48B). QTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than IYW: QTUM (9.458) vs IYW (3.631). IYW was incepted earlier than QTUM: IYW (25 years) vs QTUM (7 years). IYW (0.39) and QTUM (0.40) have comparable expense ratios . QTUM has a higher turnover IYW (11.00) vs IYW (11.00).
| IYW | QTUM | IYW / QTUM | |
| Gain YTD | 3.631 | 9.458 | 38% |
| Net Assets | 20.4B | 1.48B | 1,377% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.40 | 98% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 46.00 | 24% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 0.65 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IYW | QTUM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 83% | 7 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IYW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYW | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| LRCX - IYW | 82% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| CDNS - IYW | 81% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| KLAC - IYW | 80% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| ENTG - IYW | 80% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| SNPS - IYW | 79% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||
QTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with MKSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then MKSI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTUM | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| MKSI - QTUM | 82% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| KLAC - QTUM | 81% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| LRCX - QTUM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| TER - QTUM | 79% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| AMAT - QTUM | 79% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||