Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JACDX vs RNPFX
JACDX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts JACDX vs RNPFX
JACDX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. JACDX (52.9M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than JACDX: RNPFX (1.21) vs JACDX (0.20). JACDX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: JACDX (5 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). JACDX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). JACDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JACDX: RNPFX (250) vs JACDX (1000000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. JACDX (3.25). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.76 vs. JACDX (6.93).
| JACDX | RNPFX | JACDX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.45 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.45 | 276% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.358 | 5.075 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.9M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.21 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.25 | 7.04 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.17 | 34.96 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.93 | 13.76 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers