Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JAMRX vs RGAGX
JAMRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts JAMRX vs RGAGX
JAMRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JAMRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JAMRX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. JAMRX (29.4B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than JAMRX: RGAGX (0.51) vs JAMRX (0.00). JAMRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: JAMRX (33 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). JAMRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). JAMRX (33.00) and RGAGX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than JAMRX: RGAGX (250) vs JAMRX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. JAMRX (0.57). JAMRX return over 5 years is better than : 28.02 vs. RGAGX (17.74).
| JAMRX | RGAGX | JAMRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.29 | 331% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.29 | 331% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.335 | 7.335 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.4B | 357B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.57 | 4.75 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.03 | 41.00 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.02 | 17.74 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.61 | 106.44 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement