Advertisement
JATT vs SMAP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JATT is a Hold and SMAP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JATT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- JATT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
JATT (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.68%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.56% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| SMAP | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CTWO | 17.27 | N/A | N/A |
| COtwo Advs Physical Eur Carb AllowanceTr | |||
| HTAB | 19.13 | -0.03 | -0.16% |
| Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | |||
| PSCQ | 31.01 | -0.16 | -0.52% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (Oct) ETF | |||
| FIW | 104.86 | -1.91 | -1.79% |
| First Trust Water ETF | |||
| SMCX | 8.48 | -0.94 | -9.98% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF | |||
JATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JATT has been loosely correlated with CXAI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JATT jumps, then CXAI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JATT | 100% | N/A | ||
| CXAI - JATT | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.73% | ||
| BRKHU - JATT | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CGCTU - JATT | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GPACU - JATT | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GPAC - JATT | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SMAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SMAP and CXAI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMAP and CXAI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMAP | 100% | N/A | ||
| CXAI - SMAP | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.73% | ||
| CLBR - SMAP | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| JATT - SMAP | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GIWWU - SMAP | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TRON - SMAP | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.05% | ||
More | ||||