Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JCVSX vs RMEBX
JCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts JCVSX vs RMEBX
JHancock Classic Value R2
Price$25.57
Change-$0.09 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets619.6M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.43
Change-$0.10 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.45B
JCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JCVSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. JCVSX (620M). JCVSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: JCVSX (2.35) vs RMEBX (1.09). JCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: JCVSX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). JCVSX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. JCVSX (29.00). JCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: JCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. JCVSX (-26.25). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 54.40 vs. JCVSX (7.20).
| JCVSX | RMEBX | JCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.07 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.07 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.145 | 10.667 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 620M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 1.09 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.25 | 6.34 | -414% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.31 | 30.40 | -87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.20 | 54.40 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.18 | 92.70 | 19% |