Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JCVWX vs RMEBX
JCVWX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts JCVWX vs RMEBX
JHancock Classic Value R6
Price$25.99
Change+$0.17 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets615.8M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
JCVWX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JCVWX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JCVWX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. JCVWX (616M). JCVWX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: JCVWX (2.81) vs RMEBX (1.09). JCVWX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: JCVWX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than JCVWX (0.80). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. JCVWX (29.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCVWX: RMEBX (250) vs JCVWX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. JCVWX (-25.10). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.11 vs. JCVWX (9.58).
| JCVWX | RMEBX | JCVWX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.801 | 11.179 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 616M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.81 | 1.09 | 258% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.10 | 7.45 | -337% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.29 | 31.44 | -77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.58 | 55.11 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.59 | 89.18 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement