Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JDMAX vs NMGAX
JDMAX vs NMGAX Comparison
Open Charts JDMAX vs NMGAX
JDMAX vs NMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JDMAX vs. NMGAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JDMAX is a Buy and NMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JDMAX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. NMGAX (2.09B). JDMAX (0.00) and NMGAX (0.00) have matching dividends . JDMAX was incepted earlier than NMGAX: JDMAX (17 years) vs NMGAX (17 years). JDMAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than NMGAX (1.05). NMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. JDMAX (17.00). JDMAX (6%) and NMGAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. NMGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JDMAX: NMGAX (1000) vs JDMAX (2500). JDMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.40 vs. NMGAX (-26.51). JDMAX return over 5 years is better than : -19.68 vs. NMGAX (-36.46).
| JDMAX | NMGAX | JDMAX / NMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.05 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.05 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.624 | -0.956 | -379% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7B | 2.09B | 1,040% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.40 | -26.51 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.78 | 0.02 | 39,528% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.68 | -36.46 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.30 | 11.80 | 435% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement