Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JDMRX vs NMGCX
JDMRX vs NMGCX Comparison
Open Charts JDMRX vs NMGCX
JDMRX vs NMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JDMRX vs. NMGCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JDMRX is a Buy and NMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JDMRX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. NMGCX (2.09B). JDMRX (0.00) and NMGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . JDMRX was incepted earlier than NMGCX: JDMRX (17 years) vs NMGCX (17 years). NMGCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than JDMRX (1.41). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. JDMRX (17.00). NMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JDMRX: NMGCX (1000) vs JDMRX (2500). JDMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.32 vs. NMGCX (-27.11). JDMRX return over 5 years is better than : -23.34 vs. NMGCX (-39.14).
| JDMRX | NMGCX | JDMRX / NMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.80 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.80 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.419 | -1.440 | -237% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7B | 2.09B | 1,040% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.32 | -27.11 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.98 | -2.59 | -269% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.34 | -39.14 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.19 | 2.68 | 1,536% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement