Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JEMCX vs RNWFX
JEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts JEMCX vs RNWFX
JEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JEMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. JEMCX (10.6B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than JEMCX: RNWFX (1.22) vs JEMCX (0.43). JEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: JEMCX (20 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). JEMCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). JEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs JEMCX (1000). JEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.09 vs. RNWFX (19.39). JEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.26 vs. RNWFX (20.93).
| JEMCX | RNWFX | JEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.62 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.62 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.385 | 14.400 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 88.6B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.22 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.09 | 19.39 | 233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.36 | 53.95 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.26 | 20.93 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.87 | 106.06 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement