Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JEMCX vs RNWHX
JEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts JEMCX vs RNWHX
JEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. JEMCX (10.6B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than JEMCX: RNWHX (1.17) vs JEMCX (0.43). JEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: JEMCX (20 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). JEMCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). JEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs JEMCX (1000). JEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.09 vs. RNWHX (19.18). JEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.26 vs. RNWHX (20.16).
| JEMCX | RNWHX | JEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.72 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.72 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.385 | 14.337 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 88.6B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.17 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.09 | 19.18 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.36 | 53.27 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.26 | 20.16 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.87 | 103.40 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement