Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JEMCX vs RNWHX
JEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts JEMCX vs RNWHX
JEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. JEMCX (10.6B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than JEMCX: RNWHX (1.14) vs JEMCX (0.40). JEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: JEMCX (20 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). JEMCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). JEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs JEMCX (1000). JEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.17 vs. RNWHX (16.71). JEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.86 vs. RNWHX (14.96).
| JEMCX | RNWHX | JEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.72 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.72 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.915 | 11.487 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 90.7B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.14 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.17 | 16.71 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.36 | 40.26 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.86 | 14.96 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.49 | 102.20 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement