Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JEMKX vs RNWHX
JEMKX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts JEMKX vs RNWHX
JEMKX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JEMKX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JEMKX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. JEMKX (1.52B). JEMKX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: JEMKX (1.40) vs RNWHX (1.17). JEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: JEMKX (11 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). JEMKX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. JEMKX (33.00). JEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: JEMKX (0) vs RNWHX (250). JEMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.80 vs. RNWHX (20.97). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 17.46 vs. JEMKX (-4.84).
| JEMKX | RNWHX | JEMKX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.72 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.72 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.462 | 15.251 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 90.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.17 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.80 | 20.97 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.14 | 48.57 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.84 | 17.46 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.15 | 106.97 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement