Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JEMKX vs RNWHX
JEMKX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts JEMKX vs RNWHX
JEMKX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JEMKX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JEMKX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. JEMKX (1.5B). JEMKX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: JEMKX (1.36) vs RNWHX (1.15). JEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: JEMKX (11 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). JEMKX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. JEMKX (33.00). JEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: JEMKX (0) vs RNWHX (250). JEMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.33 vs. RNWHX (21.04). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.46 vs. JEMKX (-6.18).
| JEMKX | RNWHX | JEMKX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.72 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.72 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.181 | 16.415 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 88.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.15 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.33 | 21.04 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.14 | 52.01 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.18 | 16.46 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.74 | 107.75 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers