Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JEMSX vs RNWHX
JEMSX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts JEMSX vs RNWHX
JEMSX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JEMSX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JEMSX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. JEMSX (11.1B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than JEMSX: RNWHX (1.15) vs JEMSX (0.93). JEMSX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: JEMSX (25 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). JEMSX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). JEMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JEMSX: RNWHX (250) vs JEMSX (1000000). JEMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.39 vs. RNWHX (19.44). JEMSX return over 5 years is better than : 21.09 vs. RNWHX (11.03).
| JEMSX | RNWHX | JEMSX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.72 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.357 | 9.877 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 90.9B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.15 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.39 | 19.44 | 264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.49 | 46.29 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.09 | 11.03 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.10 | 109.14 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement