JEPQ
Price
$59.69
Change
+$0.54 (+0.91%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
41.87B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QDTY
Price
$38.91
Change
+$0.29 (+0.75%)
Updated
Sep 3, 01:21 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
38.67M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JEPQ vs QDTY

JEPQ vs QDTY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) vs. YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY)

Key Takeaways

  • JEPQ employs an actively managed equity portfolio of Nasdaq-100 constituents combined with equity-linked notes for call option overlays, while QDTY relies on a synthetic covered call strategy using daily 0DTE options on the Nasdaq 100 Index.
  • JEPQ maintains approximately 110 holdings with concentrated exposure to large-cap technology names, whereas QDTY holds a minimal number of positions primarily consisting of short-term Treasuries and option contracts.
  • Expense ratios differ significantly, with JEPQ at 0.35% compared to QDTY at 1.17%, reflecting the higher operational complexity of daily option rolling in the latter.
  • Both ETFs target current income alongside Nasdaq-100 exposure but differ in distribution frequency, with JEPQ providing monthly payouts and QDTY distributing income weekly.
  • Sector allocations in JEPQ tilt heavily toward Information Technology, while QDTY’s synthetic structure results in indirect equity exposure without traditional sector breakdowns.
  • JEPQ offers broader diversification within the Nasdaq-100 universe; QDTY emphasizes frequent premium collection through zero-days-to-expiration options, introducing distinct volatility and participation characteristics.

Introduction

Investors seeking income-generating strategies tied to Nasdaq-100 performance increasingly compare covered call ETFs that balance equity upside with option premiums. The JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and the YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) pursue similar investor goals through distinct structural approaches. JEPQ integrates direct equity holdings with call overlays, while QDTY utilizes a synthetic 0DTE option framework. These differences in implementation, cost, and risk exposure make the pair relevant for comparison in the current environment of elevated equity valuations and demand for yield-enhanced Nasdaq exposure.

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) Overview

The JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is an actively managed fund that seeks current income while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation. It constructs a portfolio of equity securities significantly aligned with the Nasdaq-100 Index and employs equity-linked notes to sell call options on the benchmark. The fund typically holds around 110 securities, with top positions including NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), Alphabet Inc (GOOG), Microsoft Corp (MSFT), and Amazon.com Inc (AMZN). Sector exposure concentrates in Information Technology, often exceeding 47%, followed by smaller allocations to Communication Services, Consumer Discretionary, and Health Care. JEPQ carries an expense ratio of 0.35% and distributes income monthly. Its hybrid structure aims to capture a substantial portion of Nasdaq-100 returns with reduced volatility relative to the benchmark.

YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) Overview

The YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is an actively managed fund that employs a synthetic covered call strategy to generate current income while providing exposure to the Nasdaq 100 Index price return. The strategy involves selling out-of-the-money, zero-days-to-expiration call options daily on the Index or related ETFs, with income distributed weekly. The fund maintains a minimal number of holdings, typically four to six positions focused on short-term U.S. Treasury securities, money market funds, and option contracts. QDTY does not hold a broad basket of individual equities. It features an expense ratio of 1.17% and targets both income and secondary capital appreciation through frequent option premium collection.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The Nasdaq-100 Index remains central to growth-oriented strategies amid ongoing technological innovation, artificial intelligence adoption, and semiconductor demand. Capital flows into derivative-income products have accelerated as investors seek to enhance yields in a higher-rate environment while retaining equity participation. Key macro drivers include interest rate expectations, corporate earnings from mega-cap technology firms, and regulatory developments affecting large technology platforms. Risks encompass sector concentration, potential volatility spikes from option expiration cycles, and shifts in growth stock valuations. Both ETFs operate within the broader covered-call and derivative-income category, which has attracted inflows during periods of range-bound or moderately bullish equity markets.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, JEPQ has delivered income with moderated volatility through its equity holdings and option overlays, providing participation in Nasdaq-100 rallies tempered by call caps. QDTY’s daily 0DTE approach enables more frequent premium harvesting, potentially supporting steadier distributions but limiting upside capture during strong trending periods. Relative positioning favors JEPQ for investors prioritizing diversification within the Nasdaq-100 universe and lower costs, while QDTY appeals in environments where daily option volatility premiums remain elevated. Both strategies exhibit sensitivity to Nasdaq-100 earnings cycles and broader technology sector momentum, though QDTY’s synthetic structure introduces additional complexity around option rollover and participation rates.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Its lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings, and established equity portfolio provide superior diversification and cost efficiency relative to the Nasdaq-100 benchmark. QDTY’s higher fee structure and reliance on daily 0DTE options introduce elevated operational complexity and potentially narrower upside participation, though its weekly distribution cadence may suit specific income objectives. Investors should evaluate these characteristics against their risk tolerance and time horizon.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
JEPQ vs. QDTY commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JEPQ is a Buy and QDTY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JEPQ has more net assets: 41.9B vs. QDTY (38.7M). QDTY has a higher annual dividend yield than JEPQ: QDTY (12.196) vs JEPQ (11.262). JEPQ was incepted earlier than QDTY: JEPQ (4 years) vs QDTY (2 years). JEPQ (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than QDTY (1.17).
JEPQQDTYJEPQ / QDTY
Gain YTD11.26212.19692%
Net Assets41.9B38.7M108,269%
Total Expense Ratio0.351.1730%
Turnover168.00N/A-
Yield10.8422.0649%
Fund Existence4 years2 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JEPQQDTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JEPQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QDTY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCRI118.571.04
+0.88%
Monarch Casino & Resort
BSAAU10.21N/A
N/A
Best Spac I Acquisition Corp
LITB3.00-0.02
-0.66%
LightInTheBox Holding Co Ltd
XPEV11.08-0.09
-0.81%
XPeng
QNC1.88-0.08
-4.08%
Quantum eMotion Corp.