JETS
Price
$31.18
Change
+$0.20 (+0.65%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
891.14M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBW
Price
$38.92
Change
-$2.30 (-5.58%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
560.09M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JETS vs PBW

JETS vs PBW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) vs. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW)

Key Takeaways

  • The U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) provides concentrated exposure to the global airline industry through a passive index-tracking strategy, while the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) targets clean energy innovation via a thematic index of renewable and efficiency-focused companies.
  • JETS holds approximately 50-57 securities with heavy weighting toward major U.S. airlines such as Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL), American Airlines Group Inc. (AAL), and United Airlines Holdings Inc. (UAL), resulting in high concentration risk.
  • PBW maintains a broader portfolio of roughly 69-71 holdings across clean energy subsectors, with top positions typically under 4% each, offering greater diversification within its theme.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.60% for JETS and 0.64% for PBW, reflecting the specialized nature of both thematic products compared with broad-market exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
  • Sector allocations differ markedly: JETS is dominated by transportation and industrials, whereas PBW spans industrials, information technology, and materials tied to renewable technologies.
  • Both ETFs exhibit elevated volatility relative to diversified equity benchmarks due to their narrow thematic mandates and sensitivity to fuel prices, policy shifts, and macroeconomic cycles.

Introduction

Investors seeking targeted exposure to cyclical or growth-oriented themes often compare specialized ETFs such as the U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). These funds do not compete directly; instead, they represent distinct strategies—one centered on aviation recovery and operations, the other on clean energy transition and technological innovation. The comparison helps clarify how differing index methodologies, concentration levels, and sector tilts influence risk profiles and positioning amid evolving macroeconomic conditions, energy markets, and policy environments.

U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) Overview

The U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) is a passively managed, thematic ETF that seeks to track the U.S. Global Jets Index. The index comprises companies engaged in the global airline industry, including passenger and cargo carriers, aircraft manufacturers, and airport operators. The fund typically holds 50-57 securities, with the top 10 holdings accounting for roughly 68% of assets. Leading positions include Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL), American Airlines Group Inc. (AAL), United Airlines Holdings Inc. (UAL), Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV), and several smaller carriers. Sector exposure is heavily skewed toward transportation (approximately 80%) and electronic technology. The expense ratio is 0.60%. The ETF is non-diversified and rebalanced periodically according to index rules, emphasizing liquidity and market-capitalization weighting within its narrow universe.

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Overview

The Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) is a passively managed, thematic ETF designed to track the WilderHill Clean Energy Index. The index focuses on companies involved in renewable energy generation, energy efficiency, energy storage, and related clean technologies. The fund holds approximately 69-71 securities, with the top 10 positions representing about 25% of assets, promoting broader diversification within the theme. Representative holdings include firms such as Hyliion Holdings Corp. (HYLN) and FuelCell Energy Inc. (FCEL). Sector allocations emphasize industrials (32-45%), information technology (22-27%), and materials. The expense ratio is 0.64%. The index undergoes quarterly rebalancing and reconstitution to maintain alignment with evolving clean energy criteria.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate in sectors influenced by macroeconomic variables, regulatory developments, and technological shifts. The airline industry underlying JETS responds to fuel price fluctuations, global travel demand, supply-chain dynamics, and geopolitical events affecting aviation. The clean energy space supporting PBW is shaped by government incentives for renewables, advancements in battery and hydrogen technologies, corporate sustainability commitments, and transitions away from fossil fuels. Capital flows into both themes have varied with interest-rate expectations, commodity trends, and policy priorities, creating distinct risk exposures for each fund.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, JETS has demonstrated sensitivity to airline earnings trends, fuel-cost volatility, and post-pandemic travel recovery patterns, often exhibiting pronounced swings during economic expansions or contractions. PBW has shown responsiveness to clean-energy policy announcements, technology breakthroughs, and shifts in investor sentiment toward sustainability, with performance influenced by broader growth-stock rotations. Relative volatility remains elevated for both compared with broad equity benchmarks, though PBW’s wider holdings base may moderate concentration-driven moves relative to JETS. Sector momentum and interest-rate environments continue to drive differential positioning between the two thematic exposures.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, established index methodology, and concentrated yet liquid exposure to a recovering cyclical sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to the U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) for investors seeking aviation-themed allocation, while acknowledging PBW’s appeal for those prioritizing clean-energy diversification and policy-driven growth.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
JETS vs. PBW commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JETS is a Hold and PBW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JETS has more net assets: 891M vs. PBW (560M). PBW has a higher annual dividend yield than JETS: PBW (28.308) vs JETS (11.079). JETS was incepted earlier than PBW: JETS (11 years) vs PBW (21 years). JETS (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than PBW (0.64). PBW has a higher turnover JETS (38.00) vs JETS (38.00).
JETSPBWJETS / PBW
Gain YTD11.07928.30839%
Net Assets891M560M159%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.6494%
Turnover38.0062.0061%
Yield0.790.60132%
Fund Existence11 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JETSPBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JETS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VDSIX26.64N/A
N/A
Victory Diversified Stock I
HDGBX24.50N/A
N/A
Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS IB
GMSMX23.75N/A
N/A
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
FCCNX80.37N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Canada C
MIEKX41.77N/A
N/A
MFS International Equity I

JETS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JETS has been closely correlated with DAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JETS jumps, then DAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JETS
1D Price
Change %
JETS100%
+0.65%
DAL - JETS
90%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
AAL - JETS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
UAL - JETS
89%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
ALGT - JETS
85%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
LUV - JETS
83%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
More

PBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBW has been closely correlated with ENVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PBW jumps, then ENVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBW
1D Price
Change %
PBW100%
-5.58%
ENVX - PBW
68%
Closely correlated
-10.35%
ACHR - PBW
67%
Closely correlated
-3.31%
QS - PBW
66%
Closely correlated
-2.50%
BLDP - PBW
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.47%
SLDP - PBW
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
More