JETS
Price
$28.07
Change
+$0.37 (+1.34%)
Updated
Jun 9, 12:24 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
844.37M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBW
Price
$39.21
Change
-$1.72 (-4.20%)
Updated
Jun 9, 12:28 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
582.72M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JETS vs PBW

Header iconJETS vs PBW Comparison
Open Charts JETS vs PBWBanner chart's image
JETS vs PBW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) vs. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW)

Key Takeaways

  • JETS provides concentrated exposure to the global airline industry through a passive strategy tracking the U.S. Global Jets Index, while PBW targets the clean energy sector via the WilderHill Clean Energy Index.
  • JETS holds approximately 50-57 securities with heavy weighting toward major U.S. passenger airlines such as Delta Air Lines (DAL), American Airlines (AAL), and United Airlines Holdings (UAL); PBW maintains 65-70 holdings with broader diversification across clean energy technologies.
  • The expense ratio for JETS stands at 0.60%, slightly below PBW's 0.64%, offering a modest cost advantage for long-term investors.
  • JETS exhibits higher sector concentration in industrials (primarily airlines), introducing cyclical risk tied to travel demand, whereas PBW spans industrials, technology, and materials with exposure to policy-driven renewable energy trends.
  • Both ETFs employ quarterly rebalancing methodologies and passive structures, though JETS uses a tiered weighting scheme favoring larger U.S. carriers while PBW applies a modified equal-weight approach within its thematic universe.
  • Liquidity profiles differ, with JETS generally showing stronger average daily trading volume suited for larger position sizes compared to PBW's more modest turnover.

Introduction

Investors seeking thematic equity exposure often compare specialized ETFs that target distinct but economically sensitive sectors. The U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) do not compete directly; instead, they represent alternative strategies for capturing growth in transportation and sustainable energy, respectively. JETS focuses on air travel recovery and global mobility, while PBW emphasizes innovation in renewables and energy efficiency. This comparison highlights structural differences that matter for portfolio construction, risk management, and alignment with broader economic cycles.

U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) Overview

The U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) seeks to track the performance of the U.S. Global Jets Index, which comprises companies involved in the global airline industry, including passenger and cargo operators, aircraft manufacturers, and airport services providers. The fund holds approximately 50-57 securities and features a tiered weighting methodology that emphasizes U.S. large-cap carriers. Top holdings typically include Delta Air Lines (DAL), American Airlines (AAL), United Airlines Holdings (UAL), Southwest Airlines (LUV), and Frontier Group Holdings (ULCC), which together account for a significant portion of assets. Sector allocation is dominated by industrials at roughly 90%, with smaller allocations to consumer cyclical and technology. The expense ratio is 0.60%. JETS operates as a passive, non-leveraged ETF with quarterly rebalancing and is listed on NYSE Arca, offering investors targeted aviation-sector exposure without active stock selection.

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Overview

The Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) is designed to track the WilderHill Clean Energy Index, focusing on companies advancing renewable energy, energy storage, power delivery, and related clean technologies. The fund maintains 65-70 holdings and employs a modified equal-weight methodology with quarterly rebalancing and reconstitution. Top holdings often feature names such as Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS), Ballard Power Systems, IonQ (IONQ), and various solar and fuel cell companies, with the top 10 typically representing under 25% of assets. Sector allocations center on industrials (approximately 32-45%), information technology (22-27%), and materials (17-21%), with additional exposure to consumer discretionary and utilities. The expense ratio is 0.64%. PBW is a passive thematic ETF listed on NYSE Arca, providing diversified access to the clean energy innovation theme.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within sectors influenced by macroeconomic shifts, policy developments, and technological change. The airline industry underlying JETS benefits from rising global travel demand, fuel price fluctuations, and post-pandemic recovery dynamics, while facing risks from economic slowdowns and geopolitical tensions affecting routes. PBW's clean energy theme responds to government incentives for renewables, corporate sustainability goals, and advancements in battery and solar technologies, yet contends with interest rate sensitivity, supply chain constraints, and variable policy support. Capital flows into both areas reflect investor interest in cyclical recovery (aviation) versus long-term decarbonization (clean energy), with regulatory environments and commodity trends serving as key drivers across recent market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, JETS has shown sensitivity to airline earnings reports and travel volume data, with positioning that benefits from domestic carrier strength during economic expansions. PBW has exhibited greater volatility tied to clean energy policy announcements and commodity price movements, reflecting its higher technology and materials exposure. Relative positioning favors JETS for investors seeking concentrated cyclical upside in transportation, while PBW offers broader thematic diversification suited to periods of accelerating renewable adoption. Both funds demonstrate distinct risk profiles, with JETS displaying tighter correlation to consumer spending patterns and PBW more aligned with interest rate expectations and green technology momentum over broader market cycles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to the U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) due to its slightly lower expense ratio, more concentrated yet liquid holdings profile, and direct alignment with cyclical airline sector momentum. PBW offers compelling thematic breadth in clean energy but carries marginally higher costs and greater sector dispersion that may introduce additional volatility. This assessment rests on diversification characteristics, cost efficiency, and relative positioning within current market cycles rather than short-term price action.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
JETS vs. PBW commentary
Jun 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JETS is a Buy and PBW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JETS has more net assets: 844M vs. PBW (583M). PBW has a higher annual dividend yield than JETS: PBW (34.156) vs JETS (-1.318). JETS was incepted earlier than PBW: JETS (11 years) vs PBW (21 years). JETS (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than PBW (0.64). PBW has a higher turnover JETS (38.00) vs JETS (38.00).
JETSPBWJETS / PBW
Gain YTD-1.31834.156-4%
Net Assets844M583M145%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.6494%
Turnover38.0062.0061%
Yield0.790.60132%
Fund Existence11 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JETSPBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JETS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTCIX188.45N/A
N/A
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital App I
ACARX42.25N/A
N/A
Alger Capital Appreciation Instl R
DVLCX22.33N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Midcap Value Fund C
CCCNX7.91N/A
N/A
Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Foc I
SNPTX23.50N/A
N/A
DWS Equity Sector Strategy Institutional

JETS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JETS has been closely correlated with DAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JETS jumps, then DAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JETS
1D Price
Change %
JETS100%
-0.86%
DAL - JETS
90%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
AAL - JETS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
UAL - JETS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
ALGT - JETS
85%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
LUV - JETS
82%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
More

PBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBW has been closely correlated with ENVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PBW jumps, then ENVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBW
1D Price
Change %
PBW100%
+0.37%
ENVX - PBW
66%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
QS - PBW
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
SLDP - PBW
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
BLDP - PBW
64%
Loosely correlated
+5.08%
AMPX - PBW
63%
Loosely correlated
-4.37%
More