JETS
Price
$27.83
Change
-$0.67 (-2.35%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
860.36M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBW
Price
$45.33
Change
-$1.66 (-3.53%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
637.03M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JETS vs PBW

Header iconJETS vs PBW Comparison
Open Charts JETS vs PBWBanner chart's image
JETS vs PBW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) vs. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW)

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) provides concentrated exposure to the global airline industry through a passive index-tracking strategy, while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) offers modified equal-weighted exposure to clean energy companies.
  • JETS holds approximately 50-56 securities with heavy weighting toward major U.S. airlines, resulting in higher concentration risk compared to PBW's roughly 65-69 holdings across renewable energy and related technologies.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.60% for JETS and 0.64% for PBW, with both funds structured as passive thematic vehicles rebalanced on a defined schedule.
  • Sector allocations differ markedly: JETS is dominated by industrials (airlines), whereas PBW spans industrials, materials, information technology, and consumer discretionary within the clean energy theme.
  • Both ETFs target distinct growth narratives—air travel recovery versus energy transition—leading to differentiated risk profiles tied to fuel prices, policy support, and macroeconomic cycles.
  • Liquidity profiles support institutional and retail use, though concentration in JETS may amplify volatility relative to PBW's broader thematic diversification.

Introduction

Investors seeking targeted thematic exposure often evaluate specialized exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that focus on specific industries or megatrends. The U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) do not compete directly within the same sector. Instead, they represent alternative strategies for investors pursuing growth in transportation and sustainable energy, respectively. Comparing these funds highlights differences in index methodology, holdings concentration, and sensitivity to distinct economic drivers such as travel demand and clean technology adoption.

U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) Overview

The U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) seeks to track the performance of the U.S. Global Jets Index, which measures the performance of companies involved in the airline industry, including operators, manufacturers, and related service providers. The fund employs a passive strategy and holds approximately 50-56 securities. Top holdings typically include Delta Air Lines (DAL), American Airlines Group (AAL), United Airlines Holdings (UAL), and Southwest Airlines (LUV), which together can account for over 60% of assets. Sector allocation is heavily concentrated in industrials, with smaller exposure to consumer cyclical companies. The expense ratio is 0.60%. The index is rebalanced periodically to maintain alignment with the underlying airline theme, emphasizing global air travel participants while maintaining U.S. listing requirements.

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Overview

The Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) tracks the WilderHill Clean Energy Index, which selects companies engaged in clean energy production, energy efficiency, and related technologies using a modified equal-weight methodology. The fund follows a passive approach and typically holds 65-69 securities. Holdings span companies involved in renewable energy harvesting, energy storage, and power delivery, with top positions often including firms such as Sigma Lithium Corporation and Bloom Energy Corporation. Sector allocations include industrials, materials, information technology, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio is 0.64%. The index undergoes quarterly rebalancing and reconstitution to reflect evolving clean energy innovations.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The airline industry, represented by JETS, remains sensitive to fuel costs, regulatory changes in aviation, and shifts in consumer travel patterns driven by economic conditions. Capital flows into the sector often respond to recovery in global mobility and fleet modernization. The clean energy space, captured by PBW, benefits from policy incentives supporting decarbonization, technological advancements in renewables, and corporate sustainability mandates. Both themes face macroeconomic influences including interest rate environments, commodity price fluctuations, and geopolitical developments affecting supply chains. Regulatory support for emissions reductions and infrastructure spending continues to shape capital allocation across these areas.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, JETS has exhibited sensitivity to airline earnings reports and fuel price movements, with positioning influenced by post-pandemic travel rebounds and capacity constraints. PBW has responded to clean energy policy developments and technology deployment rates, showing differentiated behavior during periods of sector rotation toward or away from renewables. Relative volatility tends to be higher for JETS due to its concentrated airline focus, while PBW's modified equal-weight approach and broader thematic holdings provide a measure of diversification within the energy transition. Both funds' performance dynamics reflect their distinct exposure profiles rather than broad market beta alone.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional thematic opportunities aligned with your investment objectives.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics including expense efficiency, holdings diversification, and alignment with observable thematic momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Its broader holdings base and quarterly rebalancing methodology support more consistent exposure to the expanding clean energy theme, while the U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) offers higher concentration that may suit investors with specific airline sector views. Selection depends on individual risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
JETS vs. PBW commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JETS is a Buy and PBW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JETS has more net assets: 860M vs. PBW (637M). PBW has a higher annual dividend yield than JETS: PBW (48.644) vs JETS (-0.855). JETS was incepted earlier than PBW: JETS (11 years) vs PBW (21 years). JETS (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than PBW (0.64). PBW has a higher turnover JETS (38.00) vs JETS (38.00).
JETSPBWJETS / PBW
Gain YTD-0.85548.644-2%
Net Assets860M637M135%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.6494%
Turnover38.0062.0061%
Yield0.790.60132%
Fund Existence11 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JETSPBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JETS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FKINX2.56N/A
N/A
Franklin Income A1
EALCX45.00N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Growth A
PSOAX29.52N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Value A
ASCFX29.14N/A
N/A
Virtus Small-Cap R6
BEXIX23.24-0.21
-0.90%
Baron Emerging Markets Institutional

JETS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JETS has been closely correlated with DAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JETS jumps, then DAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JETS
1D Price
Change %
JETS100%
-2.35%
DAL - JETS
90%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
AAL - JETS
89%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
UAL - JETS
88%
Closely correlated
-3.38%
ALGT - JETS
85%
Closely correlated
-5.33%
LUV - JETS
82%
Closely correlated
-3.47%
More

PBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBW has been closely correlated with ENVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PBW jumps, then ENVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBW
1D Price
Change %
PBW100%
-3.49%
ENVX - PBW
67%
Closely correlated
-4.70%
QS - PBW
65%
Loosely correlated
-4.78%
SLDP - PBW
64%
Loosely correlated
-8.68%
ACHR - PBW
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.12%
BLDP - PBW
63%
Loosely correlated
-5.02%
More