JETS
Price
$32.48
Change
+$1.30 (+4.17%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
891.14M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VIS
Price
$351.06
Change
+$2.78 (+0.80%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
8.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JETS vs VIS

JETS vs VIS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) vs. Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS)

Key Takeaways

  • The U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) offers concentrated thematic exposure to the global airline industry, while the Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) provides broad diversification across the entire U.S. industrials sector.
  • JETS maintains approximately 50 holdings with heavy concentration in major airlines, whereas VIS holds nearly 390 stocks for significantly greater diversification.
  • Expense ratios differ markedly, with JETS at 0.60% compared to VIS at 0.09%, reflecting the cost of specialized thematic access versus broad market indexing.
  • JETS targets a narrow aviation theme sensitive to fuel prices, travel demand, and global connectivity trends, while VIS captures a wide range of capital goods, transportation, and commercial services.
  • Both ETFs fall within the industrials sector but serve distinct investor objectives: pure-play airline exposure versus comprehensive sector allocation.
  • Liquidity profiles support institutional and retail use for both, though VIS benefits from lower costs and broader holdings that may reduce idiosyncratic risk.

Introduction

Investors seeking industrials exposure often evaluate specialized thematic vehicles against broad sector benchmarks. The U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) represent contrasting approaches within this category. JETS delivers targeted access to airlines and related aviation companies, while VIS tracks a comprehensive index of U.S. industrial firms. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not compete directly but offer alternative strategies for investors pursuing sector participation with differing risk, cost, and thematic profiles in the current macroeconomic environment.

U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) Overview

The U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) seeks to track the performance of the U.S. Global Jets Index. This passive, thematic exchange-traded fund focuses on companies involved in the global air travel industry, including airline operators, aircraft manufacturers, and airport service providers. The fund typically holds around 50 securities, with top positions concentrated in major U.S. carriers such as Delta Air Lines, American Airlines, United Airlines, and Southwest Airlines, often comprising the majority of assets. Sector allocation centers on industrials with additional exposure to consumer cyclical areas. JETS carries an expense ratio of 0.60% and employs a rules-based methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment. Its structure emphasizes pure-play aviation exposure rather than broad industrial representation.

Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) Overview

The Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. This passive, broad-sector exchange-traded fund provides exposure to large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. companies classified under the industrials sector according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). VIS holds approximately 390 securities, with top holdings including diversified industrial leaders such as Caterpillar, General Electric, and RTX Corporation. Sector weighting is overwhelmingly industrials at over 90%, with minor allocations elsewhere. The fund features a low expense ratio of 0.09% and uses a replication or sampling strategy to closely match the benchmark. Rebalancing occurs in line with index methodology, delivering cost-efficient, diversified access to manufacturing, transportation, aerospace, defense, and related industries.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The industrials sector encompasses capital goods production, commercial services, and transportation infrastructure, influenced by economic growth, infrastructure spending, global trade, and technological advancement. Aviation-specific themes within industrials face additional pressures from fuel costs, passenger demand recovery, and supply chain dynamics. Broader industrials benefit from capital expenditure cycles and defense budgets. Regulatory developments around emissions, labor, and trade policies affect both segments. Macroeconomic drivers such as interest rate expectations and corporate earnings trends shape capital flows into these areas during recent market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the concentrated airline focus of the U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has produced higher volatility tied to travel recovery patterns and commodity price movements. The Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS), with its diversified holdings across multiple sub-industries, has exhibited more stable relative positioning during sector rotations and earnings seasons. Differences in top holdings lead to distinct sensitivities: JETS responds more directly to airline-specific catalysts, while VIS captures broader industrial momentum from manufacturing and infrastructure trends. Both have participated in industrials rallies driven by economic expansion, though their structural profiles result in varying drawdowns during periods of uncertainty.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover data-driven opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, greater diversification across hundreds of holdings, and broad coverage of the industrials sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable risk-adjusted positioning to the Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) for investors seeking core sector exposure. The U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) offers specialized appeal for those with a strong conviction in aviation recovery but carries higher costs and concentration risk.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
JETS vs. VIS commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JETS is a Hold and VIS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIS has more net assets: 8.36B vs. JETS (891M). VIS has a higher annual dividend yield than JETS: VIS (17.016) vs JETS (11.079). JETS was incepted earlier than VIS: JETS (11 years) vs VIS (22 years). VIS (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than JETS (0.60). JETS has a higher turnover VIS (5.00) vs VIS (5.00).
JETSVISJETS / VIS
Gain YTD11.07917.01665%
Net Assets891M8.36B11%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.09667%
Turnover38.005.00760%
Yield0.790.8989%
Fund Existence11 years22 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JETSVIS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JETS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VIS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPT3.42N/A
-0.12%
Putnam Premier Income Trust
SPBW28.58-0.08
-0.28%
AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF
FXC68.80-0.27
-0.39%
Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar
BCI22.51-0.28
-1.23%
abrdn Blmb AllCmdStrK1Fr ETF
MSST24.49-1.05
-4.12%
YieldMax MSTR Perf & Dis Trgt 25 ETF

JETS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JETS has been closely correlated with DAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JETS jumps, then DAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JETS
1D Price
Change %
JETS100%
+0.65%
DAL - JETS
90%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
AAL - JETS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
UAL - JETS
89%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
ALGT - JETS
85%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
LUV - JETS
83%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
More

VIS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIS has been closely correlated with EMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VIS jumps, then EMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIS
1D Price
Change %
VIS100%
-2.14%
EMR - VIS
78%
Closely correlated
-4.71%
WAB - VIS
78%
Closely correlated
-2.35%
CAT - VIS
78%
Closely correlated
-3.72%
TKR - VIS
77%
Closely correlated
-3.05%
CSW - VIS
76%
Closely correlated
-2.04%
More