Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFACX vs RWMFX
JFACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JFACX vs RWMFX
JFACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFACX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. JFACX (437M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JFACX: RWMFX (1.44) vs JFACX (0.00). JFACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JFACX (11 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JFACX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JFACX (8.00). JFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JFACX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.76 vs. JFACX (-5.03). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.02 vs. JFACX (19.98).
| JFACX | RWMFX | JFACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.31 | 394% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.31 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.450 | 3.858 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.44 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.03 | 5.76 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.16 | 29.17 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.98 | 28.02 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.31 | 77.65 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers