Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFACX vs RWMFX
JFACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JFACX vs RWMFX
JFACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFACX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. JFACX (419M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JFACX: RWMFX (1.41) vs JFACX (0.00). JFACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JFACX (11 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JFACX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. JFACX (8.00). JFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JFACX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. JFACX (-7.37). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. JFACX (17.85).
| JFACX | RWMFX | JFACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.31 | 394% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.31 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.638 | 4.508 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 419M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.41 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.37 | 2.09 | -353% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.98 | 30.24 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.85 | 27.39 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.41 | 82.36 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement