Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFACX vs RWMFX
JFACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JFACX vs RWMFX
JFACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFACX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. JFACX (492M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JFACX: RWMFX (1.40) vs JFACX (0.00). JFACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JFACX (11 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JFACX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JFACX (8.00). JFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JFACX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. JFACX (2.62). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. JFACX (24.36).
| JFACX | RWMFX | JFACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.31 | 394% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.31 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.359 | 5.575 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 492M | 214B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.62 | 8.10 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.67 | 33.11 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.36 | 26.71 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.13 | 85.42 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement