Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFAMX vs RNWBX
JFAMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts JFAMX vs RNWBX
JFAMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFAMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFAMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. JFAMX (11.3B). JFAMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: JFAMX (0.73) vs RNWBX (0.41). JFAMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: JFAMX (25 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than JFAMX (1.32). JFAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFAMX: RNWBX (250) vs JFAMX (1000). JFAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.36 vs. RNWBX (18.14). JFAMX return over 5 years is better than : 25.18 vs. RNWBX (9.30).
| JFAMX | RNWBX | JFAMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.66 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.66 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.638 | 12.082 | 237% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 90.7B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.41 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 54.36 | 18.14 | 300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.27 | 39.22 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.18 | 9.30 | 271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.17 | 97.97 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement