Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFAMX vs RNWHX
JFAMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts JFAMX vs RNWHX
JFAMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFAMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFAMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. JFAMX (11.3B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than JFAMX: RNWHX (1.14) vs JFAMX (0.73). JFAMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: JFAMX (25 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). JFAMX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). JFAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFAMX: RNWHX (250) vs JFAMX (1000). JFAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.36 vs. RNWHX (19.47). JFAMX return over 5 years is better than : 25.18 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| JFAMX | RNWHX | JFAMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.72 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.72 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.638 | 12.651 | 226% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 90.7B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.14 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 54.36 | 19.47 | 279% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.27 | 43.67 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.18 | 14.04 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.17 | 107.31 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement