Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHSGX vs RGACX
JHSGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts JHSGX vs RGACX
JHancock U.S. Growth R4
Price$31.60
Change-$0.07 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.99B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.25
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
JHSGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHSGX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHSGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. JHSGX (3B). RGACX pays higher dividends than JHSGX: RGACX (0.07) vs JHSGX (0.00). JHSGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: JHSGX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). JHSGX (0.96) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . JHSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). JHSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: JHSGX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.97 vs. JHSGX (15.37). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.16 vs. JHSGX (43.46).
| JHSGX | RGACX | JHSGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.94 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.94 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.092 | 18.419 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3B | 340B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.37 | 16.97 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.19 | 61.65 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.46 | 46.16 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.65 | 100.90 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement