It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JJSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JJSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
JJSF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -4.24% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -21.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.86%.
JJSF is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2025.
LW is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
JJSF | LW | JJSF / LW | |
Capitalization | 2.8B | 15.4B | 18% |
EBITDA | 177M | 1.34B | 13% |
Gain YTD | -2.367 | -41.476 | 6% |
P/E Ratio | 34.59 | 13.62 | 254% |
Revenue | 1.56B | 6.35B | 25% |
Total Cash | 50M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 147M | 3.63B | 4% |
JJSF | LW | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 10 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LW's Valuation (39) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as JJSF (53). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to JJSF’s over the last 12 months.
LW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as JJSF (100). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to JJSF’s over the last 12 months.
LW's SMR Rating (25) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JJSF (72). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than JJSF’s over the last 12 months.
LW's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as JJSF (70). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to JJSF’s over the last 12 months.
LW's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JJSF (54). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than JJSF’s over the last 12 months.
JJSF | LW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago59% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago54% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% | 1 day ago52% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago54% | 5 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago55% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago60% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
EPLDX | 21.29 | 0.26 | +1.24% |
NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Class R6 | |||
RIRHX | 68.58 | 0.49 | +0.72% |
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R5E | |||
ZGFAX | 17.64 | 0.11 | +0.63% |
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y | |||
ABICX | 13.52 | 0.02 | +0.15% |
AB International Value C | |||
GSPKX | 16.89 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Prem Instl |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JJSF has been loosely correlated with LANC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JJSF jumps, then LANC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JJSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
JJSF | 100% | -0.40% | ||
LANC - JJSF | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
JBSS - JJSF | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
INGR - JJSF | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
SENEA - JJSF | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
CAG - JJSF | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.