Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCFX vs RWMFX
JLCFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCFX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R4
Price$75.34
Change-$0.07 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.06B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
JLCFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCFX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. JLCFX (6.06B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCFX: RWMFX (1.41) vs JLCFX (0.35). JLCFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCFX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCFX (19.00). JLCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCFX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. JLCFX (-5.08). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.02 vs. JLCFX (30.46).
| JLCFX | RWMFX | JLCFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.31 | 329% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.972 | 8.905 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.06B | 204B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.41 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.08 | 4.59 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.71 | 29.92 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.46 | 45.02 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.60 | 72.75 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement