Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCFX vs RWMFX
JLCFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCFX vs RWMFX
JLCFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCFX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. JLCFX (6.36B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCFX: RWMFX (1.40) vs JLCFX (0.31). JLCFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCFX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCFX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). JLCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). JLCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCFX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. JLCFX (6.24). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. JLCFX (1.62).
| JLCFX | RWMFX | JLCFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.31 | 290% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.31 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.141 | 5.575 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 214B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.40 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.24 | 8.10 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.26 | 33.11 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.62 | 26.71 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.93 | 85.42 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement