Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCVX vs RWMFX
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCVX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R5
Price$78.24
Change+$0.15 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.33B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.40
Change+$0.17 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.01B
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCVX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCVX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. JLCVX (6.33B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCVX: RWMFX (1.42) vs JLCVX (0.52). JLCVX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCVX (16 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). JLCVX (0.72) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCVX (19.00). JLCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCVX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. JLCVX (0.78). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.25 vs. JLCVX (43.14).
| JLCVX | RWMFX | JLCVX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.31 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.31 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.742 | 10.796 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.33B | 209B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.42 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.78 | 7.12 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.62 | 41.01 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.14 | 57.25 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.58 | 85.97 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers