Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCVX vs RWMFX
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCVX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R5
Price$76.97
Change+$0.34 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.26B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.05
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.31B
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCVX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCVX is a Buy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. JLCVX (6.26B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCVX: RWMFX (1.43) vs JLCVX (0.53). JLCVX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCVX (16 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). JLCVX (0.72) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCVX (19.00). JLCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCVX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. JLCVX (-0.17). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. JLCVX (38.17).
| JLCVX | RWMFX | JLCVX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.31 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.31 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.505 | 9.752 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.26B | 207B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.43 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.17 | 7.43 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.78 | 37.81 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.17 | 53.32 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.00 | 88.54 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement