Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCVX vs RWMFX
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCVX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R5
Price$76.31
Change-$0.07 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.06B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCVX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCVX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. JLCVX (6.06B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCVX: RWMFX (1.41) vs JLCVX (0.51). JLCVX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCVX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCVX (0.72) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCVX (19.00). JLCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCVX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. JLCVX (-4.78). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.02 vs. JLCVX (31.63).
| JLCVX | RWMFX | JLCVX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.31 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.31 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.157 | 8.905 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.06B | 204B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.41 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.78 | 4.59 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.48 | 29.92 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.63 | 45.02 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.94 | 72.75 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement