Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCVX vs RWMFX
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCVX vs RWMFX
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCVX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCVX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. JLCVX (6.14B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCVX: RWMFX (1.40) vs JLCVX (0.47). JLCVX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCVX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCVX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). JLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). JLCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCVX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. JLCVX (0.48). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.15 vs. JLCVX (-1.77).
| JLCVX | RWMFX | JLCVX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.31 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.31 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.998 | 6.052 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.14B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.40 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.48 | 11.31 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.05 | 31.43 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.77 | 27.15 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.05 | 87.48 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement