Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCWX vs RWEBX
JLCWX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts JLCWX vs RWEBX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R6
Price$76.40
Change-$0.07 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.06B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.77
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
JLCWX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCWX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCWX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. JLCWX (6.06B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than JLCWX: RWEBX (0.76) vs JLCWX (0.55). JLCWX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: JLCWX (14 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than JLCWX (0.67). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCWX (19.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than JLCWX: RWEBX (250) vs JLCWX (1000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.78 vs. JLCWX (-4.72). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.82 vs. JLCWX (31.85).
| JLCWX | RWEBX | JLCWX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.06 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.06 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.208 | 8.175 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.06B | 204B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.76 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.72 | 3.78 | -125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.64 | 27.15 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 40.82 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.46 | 66.81 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement