Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCWX vs RWEBX
JLCWX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts JLCWX vs RWEBX
JLCWX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCWX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCWX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. JLCWX (5.88B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than JLCWX: RWEBX (0.74) vs JLCWX (0.50). JLCWX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: JLCWX (15 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than JLCWX (0.66). JLCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWEBX (32.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than JLCWX: RWEBX (250) vs JLCWX (1000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.26 vs. JLCWX (-3.34). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.43 vs. JLCWX (-4.59).
| JLCWX | RWEBX | JLCWX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.06 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.06 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.297 | 3.934 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.74 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.34 | 1.26 | -265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.27 | 27.16 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.59 | 23.43 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.30 | 75.35 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers