Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCWX vs RWMFX
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCWX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R6
Price$77.00
Change+$1.14 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.21B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.75
Change+$1.02 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.77B
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCWX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCWX is a Hold and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. JLCWX (6.21B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCWX: RWMFX (1.42) vs JLCWX (0.56). JLCWX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCWX (14 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). JLCWX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCWX (19.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JLCWX: RWMFX (250) vs JLCWX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.28 vs. JLCWX (-3.41). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.82 vs. JLCWX (33.67).
| JLCWX | RWMFX | JLCWX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.361 | 9.727 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.21B | 207B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.42 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.41 | 4.28 | -80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.00 | 46.37 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.67 | 50.82 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.49 | 79.56 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement