Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCWX vs RWMFX
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCWX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R6
Price$76.40
Change-$0.07 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.06B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCWX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCWX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. JLCWX (6.06B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCWX: RWMFX (1.41) vs JLCWX (0.55). JLCWX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCWX (14 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCWX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCWX (19.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JLCWX: RWMFX (250) vs JLCWX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. JLCWX (-4.72). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.02 vs. JLCWX (31.85).
| JLCWX | RWMFX | JLCWX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.208 | 8.905 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.06B | 204B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.41 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.72 | 4.59 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.64 | 29.92 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 45.02 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.46 | 72.75 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement