Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCWX vs RWMFX
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCWX vs RWMFX
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCWX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCWX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. JLCWX (5.88B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCWX: RWMFX (1.41) vs JLCWX (0.50). JLCWX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCWX (15 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCWX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). JLCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JLCWX: RWMFX (250) vs JLCWX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. JLCWX (-3.34). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. JLCWX (-4.59).
| JLCWX | RWMFX | JLCWX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.31 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.297 | 4.508 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.41 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.34 | 2.09 | -160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.27 | 30.24 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.59 | 27.39 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.30 | 82.36 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement