Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCWX vs RWMFX
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCWX vs RWMFX
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCWX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCWX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. JLCWX (6.04B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCWX: RWMFX (1.40) vs JLCWX (0.52). JLCWX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCWX (15 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCWX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). JLCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JLCWX: RWMFX (250) vs JLCWX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.03 vs. JLCWX (2.04). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. JLCWX (-1.80).
| JLCWX | RWMFX | JLCWX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.31 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.843 | 1.322 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.04B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.40 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | 7.03 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.20 | 30.20 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.80 | 26.38 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.72 | 82.33 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement