Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCYX vs RWMFX
JLCYX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCYX vs RWMFX
JLCYX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCYX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCYX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. JLCYX (6.12B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCYX: RWMFX (1.40) vs JLCYX (0.09). JLCYX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCYX (14 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCYX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). JLCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). JLCYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCYX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. JLCYX (1.44). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.55 vs. JLCYX (-3.95).
| JLCYX | RWMFX | JLCYX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.31 | 371% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.31 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.626 | 1.616 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.12B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 1.40 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.44 | 8.15 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.25 | 30.58 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.95 | 27.55 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.01 | 82.86 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement