Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLVRX vs RMFCX
JLVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts JLVRX vs RMFCX
JLVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLVRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. JLVRX (4.95B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than JLVRX: RMFCX (1.15) vs JLVRX (1.08). JLVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: JLVRX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than JLVRX (0.60). JLVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 185.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). JLVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: JLVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). JLVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.67 vs. RMFCX (4.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. JLVRX (30.06).
| JLVRX | RMFCX | JLVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.91 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.801 | 8.539 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.95B | 117B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.15 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.67 | 4.75 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.64 | 35.38 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.06 | 35.61 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.46 | 94.16 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement