Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JPDVX vs RLBFX
JPDVX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts JPDVX vs RLBFX
JPDVX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JPDVX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPDVX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. JPDVX (526M). JPDVX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: JPDVX (2.59) vs RLBFX (2.02). JPDVX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: JPDVX (33 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). JPDVX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). JPDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JPDVX: RLBFX (250) vs JPDVX (3000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.89 vs. JPDVX (3.10). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.67 vs. JPDVX (-5.61).
| JPDVX | RLBFX | JPDVX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.30 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.30 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.702 | 10.111 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000000 | 250 | 1,200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 526M | 279B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 2.02 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 17.89 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.53 | 47.21 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.61 | 36.67 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.61 | 90.23 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers