Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JPGSX vs RGACX
JPGSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts JPGSX vs RGACX
JPGSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JPGSX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPGSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. JPGSX (1.64B). JPGSX pays higher dividends than RGACX: JPGSX (0.00) vs RGACX (0.00). JPGSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: JPGSX (23 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than JPGSX (0.65). JPGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than JPGSX: RGACX (250) vs JPGSX (1000000). JPGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.21 vs. RGACX (7.94). JPGSX return over 5 years is better than : 39.21 vs. RGACX (13.23).
| JPGSX | RGACX | JPGSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.93 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.298 | 6.185 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.21 | 7.94 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.02 | 43.05 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.21 | 13.23 | 296% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.08 | 107.97 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement