JPM
Price
$243.15
Change
-$0.40 (-0.16%)
Updated
Apr 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
573.02B
77 days until earnings call
UBS
Price
$30.28
Change
+$0.26 (+0.87%)
Updated
Apr 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
98.65B
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

JPM vs UBS

Header iconJPM vs UBS Comparison
Open Charts JPM vs UBSBanner chart's image
JPMorgan Chase & Co
Price$243.15
Change-$0.40 (-0.16%)
Volume$61.57K
Capitalization573.02B
UBS Group AG
Price$30.28
Change+$0.26 (+0.87%)
Volume$36K
Capitalization98.65B
JPM vs UBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
JPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JPM vs. UBS commentary
Apr 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPM is a StrongBuy and UBS is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 29, 2025
Stock price -- (JPM: $243.22 vs. UBS: $30.28)
Brand notoriety: JPM: Notable vs. UBS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPM: 54% vs. UBS: 52%
Market capitalization -- JPM: $573.02B vs. UBS: $98.65B
JPM [@Major Banks] is valued at $573.02B. UBS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $98.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • JPM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UBS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the long-term than UBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JPM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JPM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the short-term than UBS.

Price Growth

JPM (@Major Banks) experienced а +6.21% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was +9.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +4.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +72.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

JPM is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.

UBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+4.41% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPM($573B) has a higher market cap than UBS($98.7B). JPM has higher P/E ratio than UBS: JPM (12.26) vs UBS (3.61). UBS YTD gains are higher at: 3.078 vs. JPM (2.616). UBS has more cash in the bank: 144B vs. JPM (26.1B). UBS has less debt than JPM: UBS (378B) vs JPM (437B). JPM has higher revenues than UBS: JPM (155B) vs UBS (39.4B).
JPMUBSJPM / UBS
Capitalization573B98.7B581%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.6163.07885%
P/E Ratio12.263.61340%
Revenue155B39.4B393%
Total Cash26.1B144B18%
Total Debt437B378B116%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPM vs UBS: Fundamental Ratings
JPM
UBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2816
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1111
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
432
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JPM's Valuation (50) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (50). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (11). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (4). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (58). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JPM (43). This means that UBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than JPM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JPMUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
JPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFLI0.570.03
+6.33%
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp
CLMT11.070.59
+5.68%
Calumet Inc.
SLM28.210.46
+1.66%
SLM Corp
HUM263.20-1.20
-0.45%
Humana
LXFR9.97-0.05
-0.50%
Luxfer Holdings PLC

JPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPM
1D Price
Change %
JPM100%
-0.14%
WFC - JPM
81%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
BAC - JPM
80%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
C - JPM
80%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
BCS - JPM
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
NTB - JPM
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.79%
More

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
+0.87%
HSBC - UBS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
C - UBS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
SAN - UBS
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
BBVA - UBS
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
BAC - UBS
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
More