It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JPM’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JPM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
JPM (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.19% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.44%.
JPM is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.
WFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
JPM | WFC | JPM / WFC | |
Capitalization | 573B | 204B | 281% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 47.328 | 56.050 | 84% |
P/E Ratio | 12.26 | 11.93 | 103% |
Revenue | 155B | 82.6B | 188% |
Total Cash | 26.1B | 33B | 79% |
Total Debt | 437B | 219B | 200% |
JPM | WFC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 6 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WFC's Valuation (81) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (95). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (32). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
WFC's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (17). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.
WFC's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (26). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.
JPM | WFC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago56% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago62% | 1 day ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 4 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago64% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago61% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.