Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JQLCX vs PACAX
JQLCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JQLCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R2
Price$12.34
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.22
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets575.59M
JQLCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JQLCX vs. PACAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JQLCX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JQLCX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. PACAX (576M). JQLCX (3.57) and PACAX (3.40) have matching dividends . JQLCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JQLCX (14 years) vs PACAX (32 years). JQLCX (1.32) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JQLCX (16.00). JQLCX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JQLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. PACAX (5.97). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.58 vs. JQLCX (8.75).
| JQLCX | PACAX | JQLCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.847 | 7.904 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 576M | 276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 3.40 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 5.97 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.03 | 22.48 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.75 | 10.58 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.70 | 28.40 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement