Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JQLCX vs PACAX
JQLCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JQLCX vs PACAX
JQLCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JQLCX vs. PACAX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JQLCX is a Hold and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JQLCX has more cash in the bank: 1.44B vs. PACAX (850M). JQLCX pays higher dividends than PACAX: JQLCX (3.56) vs PACAX (2.74). JQLCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JQLCX (14 years) vs PACAX (33 years). JQLCX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PACAX (0.96). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. JQLCX (15.00). JQLCX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.76 vs. JQLCX (6.78). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.80 vs. JQLCX (7.74).
| JQLCX | PACAX | JQLCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.96 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.96 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.535 | 4.378 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 850M | 169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 2.74 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 7.76 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.07 | 32.43 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.74 | 8.80 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.61 | 36.71 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement