Ad is loading...
JVMAX vs NMVZX
JVMAX vs NMVZX Comparison
Open Charts JVMAX vs NMVZX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap A
Price$25.06
Change+$0.24 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.63B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Z
Price$11.49
Change+$0.10 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets530.14M
JVMAX vs NMVZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMAX vs. NMVZX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMAX is a Buy and NMVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMAX has more cash in the bank: 20.6B vs. NMVZX (530M). NMVZX pays higher dividends than JVMAX: NMVZX (3.87) vs JVMAX (0.63). JVMAX was incepted earlier than NMVZX: JVMAX (28 years) vs NMVZX (8 years). JVMAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than NMVZX (0.84). NMVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. JVMAX (47.00). JVMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMVZX: JVMAX (1000) vs NMVZX (2500). NMVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.33 vs. JVMAX (-8.80). JVMAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.78 vs. NMVZX (5.69).
| JVMAX | NMVZX | JVMAX / NMVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.79 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.84 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.360 | -6.233 | 38% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.6B | 530M | 3,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 3.87 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.80 | -7.33 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.03 | -9.47 | -43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.78 | 5.69 | 874% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...