Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LLPFX
JVMCX vs LLPFX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LLPFX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.11
Change-$0.07 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.35B
JVMCX vs LLPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LLPFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LLPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. LLPFX (1.16B). LLPFX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LLPFX (0.99) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LLPFX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LLPFX (38 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LLPFX (0.97). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. LLPFX (38.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLPFX: JVMCX (1000) vs LLPFX (10000). LLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.11 vs. JVMCX (-0.39). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.41 vs. LLPFX (33.65).
| JVMCX | LLPFX | JVMCX / LLPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.79 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.97 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.383 | 0.082 | 13,842% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 10000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 1.16B | 2,091% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.39 | 1.11 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.90 | 27.70 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.41 | 33.65 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.41 | 6.63 | 700% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement