Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCPX
JVMCX vs LMCPX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCPX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.19
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.36B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$32.78
Change+$0.13 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
JVMCX vs LMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCPX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and LMCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.4B vs. LMCPX (1.14B). LMCPX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCPX (0.36) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCPX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCPX (28 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LMCPX (1.23). LMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCPX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.64 vs. LMCPX (-7.22). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.05 vs. LMCPX (42.21).
| JVMCX | LMCPX | JVMCX / LMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.23 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.23 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.423 | 1.486 | 769% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.4B | 1.14B | 2,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.64 | -7.22 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.01 | 20.66 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.05 | 42.21 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.33 | 40.90 | 111% |