Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCPX
JVMCX vs LMCPX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCPX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.48B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$31.94
Change-$0.14 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
JVMCX vs LMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and LMCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. LMCPX (1.09B). LMCPX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCPX (0.36) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCPX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCPX (28 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LMCPX (1.22). LMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCPX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.96 vs. LMCPX (-12.03). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.91 vs. LMCPX (22.66).
| JVMCX | LMCPX | JVMCX / LMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.22 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.22 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.877 | -0.681 | -1,010% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5B | 1.09B | 2,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.96 | -12.03 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.36 | 10.97 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.91 | 22.66 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.70 | 34.99 | 93% |