Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCPX
JVMCX vs LMCPX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCPX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.87
Change+$0.07 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.24B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$32.01
Change+$0.13 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
JVMCX vs LMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCPX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.2B vs. LMCPX (1.09B). LMCPX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCPX (0.38) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCPX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCPX (28 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCPX (1.23). LMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCPX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.17 vs. LMCPX (-7.82). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.93 vs. LMCPX (36.74).
| JVMCX | LMCPX | JVMCX / LMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.23 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.23 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.929 | -1.300 | -456% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.2B | 1.09B | 2,035% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.17 | -7.82 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.60 | 18.68 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | 36.74 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.65 | 27.84 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement