Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCQX
JVMCX vs LMCQX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCQX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.67
Change-$0.35 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.22B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$33.27
Change-$0.28 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMCX vs LMCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCQX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. LMCQX (1.14B). LMCQX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCQX (0.23) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCQX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCQX (18 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LMCQX (1.38). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCQX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.91 vs. LMCQX (-7.92). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.76 vs. LMCQX (36.21).
| JVMCX | LMCQX | JVMCX / LMCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.38 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.38 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.751 | 1.513 | 711% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 1.14B | 2,132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.91 | -7.92 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.04 | 24.97 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.76 | 36.21 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.97 | 37.32 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement