Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCQX
JVMCX vs LMCQX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCQX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.24
Change+$0.08 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.64B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$33.10
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
JVMCX vs LMCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCQX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. LMCQX (1.11B). LMCQX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCQX (0.24) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCQX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCQX (17 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCQX (1.38). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCQX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.03 vs. LMCQX (-5.50). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.91 vs. LMCQX (38.95).
| JVMCX | LMCQX | JVMCX / LMCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.38 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.38 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.352 | 0.242 | 3,037% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 1.11B | 2,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.03 | -5.50 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.46 | 20.74 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.91 | 38.95 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.62 | 29.76 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement