Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCQX
JVMCX vs LMCQX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCQX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.95
Change-$0.06 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.02B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$32.86
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
JVMCX vs LMCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCQX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. LMCQX (1.12B). LMCQX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCQX (0.24) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCQX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCQX (17 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LMCQX (1.38). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCQX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.88 vs. LMCQX (-7.79). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.76 vs. LMCQX (34.88).
| JVMCX | LMCQX | JVMCX / LMCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.38 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.38 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.711 | -0.605 | -1,770% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 1.12B | 2,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.88 | -7.79 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.07 | 12.62 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.76 | 34.88 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.40 | 36.03 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement