Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCQX
JVMCX vs LMCQX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCQX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.29
Change+$0.19 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.35B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$33.27
Change+$0.28 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMCX vs LMCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCQX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and LMCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. LMCQX (1.13B). LMCQX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCQX (0.24) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCQX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCQX (17 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LMCQX (1.38). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCQX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.85 vs. LMCQX (-7.86). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.17 vs. LMCQX (39.80).
| JVMCX | LMCQX | JVMCX / LMCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.38 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.38 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.067 | -0.182 | -6,096% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 1.13B | 2,150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | -7.86 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.57 | 16.05 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.17 | 39.80 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.09 | 37.94 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement