Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBMRX
JVMCX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBMRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.44B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$27.42
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.66M
JVMCX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBMRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.4B vs. NBMRX (48.7M). NBMRX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBMRX (0.75) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBMRX (7 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NBMRX (1.72). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: NBMRX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.07 vs. JVMCX (-8.54). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 56.11 vs. JVMCX (25.73).
| JVMCX | NBMRX | JVMCX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.75 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.72 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.680 | 4.649 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.4B | 48.7M | 48,049% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.75 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.54 | -2.07 | 412% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.16 | 15.57 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.73 | 56.11 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement