Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBMRX
JVMCX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBMRX
JVMCX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBMRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.3B vs. NBMRX (55M). NBMRX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBMRX (0.93) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMCX (15 years) vs NBMRX (7 years). NBMRX (2.65) is less costly to investors than JVMCX (1.86). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NBMRX (16.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: NBMRX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.93 vs. JVMCX (4.60). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 28.72 vs. JVMCX (7.38).
| JVMCX | NBMRX | JVMCX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.75 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.65 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.220 | 15.502 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.3B | 55M | 42,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.60 | 15.93 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.78 | 25.17 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.38 | 28.72 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers