Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBMRX
JVMCX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBMRX
JVMCX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBMRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. NBMRX (54M). NBMRX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBMRX (0.96) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMCX (15 years) vs NBMRX (7 years). NBMRX (2.65) is less costly to investors than JVMCX (1.86). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NBMRX (16.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: NBMRX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.89 vs. JVMCX (6.33). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 24.27 vs. JVMCX (4.62).
| JVMCX | NBMRX | JVMCX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.75 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.65 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.366 | 13.326 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.9B | 54M | 42,407% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.96 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 19.89 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.34 | 29.93 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.62 | 24.27 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement