Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.44B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$27.36
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.66M
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.4B vs. NBRAX (48.7M). NBRAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRAX (0.35) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). JVMCX (1.86) and NBRAX (1.78) have similar cost to investors . JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRAX (29.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.48 vs. JVMCX (-8.54). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.77 vs. JVMCX (25.73).
| JVMCX | NBRAX | JVMCX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.21 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.78 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.680 | 4.222 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.4B | 48.7M | 48,049% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.54 | -2.48 | 344% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.16 | 13.37 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.73 | 51.77 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.45 | 29.14 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement