Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.3B vs. NBRAX (55M). NBRAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRAX (0.48) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMCX (15 years) vs NBRAX (16 years). JVMCX (1.86) and NBRAX (1.82) have similar cost to investors . JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NBRAX (16.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.42 vs. JVMCX (4.60). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.15 vs. JVMCX (7.38).
| JVMCX | NBRAX | JVMCX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.21 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.82 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.220 | 15.188 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.3B | 55M | 42,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.60 | 15.42 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.78 | 23.56 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.38 | 25.15 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.64 | 56.73 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement