Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and NBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.5B vs. NBRAX (54.3M). NBRAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRAX (0.50) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMCX (15 years) vs NBRAX (16 years). JVMCX (1.86) and NBRAX (1.82) have similar cost to investors . JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRAX (16.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.42 vs. JVMCX (5.42). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.86 vs. JVMCX (-1.33).
| JVMCX | NBRAX | JVMCX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.21 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.82 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.747 | 15.265 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.5B | 54.3M | 41,436% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 22.42 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.98 | 32.16 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.33 | 20.86 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.24 | 60.11 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement