Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. NBRAX (54M). NBRAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRAX (0.50) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMCX (15 years) vs NBRAX (16 years). JVMCX (1.86) and NBRAX (1.82) have similar cost to investors . JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NBRAX (16.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.40 vs. JVMCX (6.33). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.87 vs. JVMCX (4.62).
| JVMCX | NBRAX | JVMCX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.21 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.82 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.366 | 13.057 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.9B | 54M | 42,407% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 19.40 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.34 | 28.25 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.62 | 20.87 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.50 | 62.92 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement